Free Consultation
The office is open as per the NYS Covid-19 guidelines. We are now doing both in-person and telephone consultations. Please call the office at 718-855-6840 to schedule a time to speak with one of our experienced bankruptcy attorneys.

When Can a Bankruptcy Case Be Dismissed With Prejudice?

A few months ago, I wrote about when a chapter 7 bankruptcy case can be dismissed, and I touched on dismissals that are with or without “prejudice.” Today I’ll clarify what this means for New York bankruptcy debtors.

Section 349(a) of the Bankruptcy Code prevents a dismissal from interfering with a debtor’s future rights to discharge debts or refile bankruptcy in the future. This limitation is what New York bankruptcy lawyers refer to when they characterize dismissals as “without prejudice.” That is, a debtor can refile the case without any penalty.

Now, there is an exception to this limitation spelled out in section 109(g) of the Bankruptcy Code. It sets a time bar, 180 days, on debtors whose cases have been dismissed without prejudice for one of two reasons. Reason number one is if the debtor “willfully failed to abide by court orders or failed to appear before the court to properly prosecute the case,” and the court dismissed the case. Here, the Bankruptcy Code appears to be giving bankruptcy judges a way to avoid dismissing these kinds of cases with prejudice, or it’s trying to standardize the punishment for some forms of debtor misconduct.

Reason number two is circumstances in which the debtor voluntarily dismissed the case after a creditor filed a motion to lift the automatic stay. The idea here is to prevent a form of serial bankruptcy in which debtors file and dismiss their cases to ensure a foreclosure on their properties is never executed.

So, to recap, if a bankruptcy court dismisses a case without prejudice, then there are no penalties, unless the debtor is a nuisance to the court or engaging in serial bankruptcy. When, then, is a dismissal “with prejudice” allowed?

Back in section 349(a), the Bankruptcy Code can grants bankruptcy courts broad powers to punish debtors “for cause.” In these situations, which contrast with dismissals without prejudice, the bankruptcy court may limit a debtor’s right to file bankruptcy until a later date, or it can bar the discharge of debts in later bankruptcies. The Bankruptcy Code does not specify what “for cause” means, but it’s generally interpreted as any behavior by the debtor that abuses the bankruptcy system. Examples include defrauding the court, filing multiple concurrent cases, hiding assets, or hindering creditors.

If a bankruptcy court dismisses a debtor’s case with prejudice and sets a time bar for refiling, then the honest debtor’s best option is to tough it out and refile after the time period has elapsed. If the debtor wishes to challenge the court’s determination that some debts should forever be nondischargeable, then the debtor’s best hope is to appeal the decision to a federal district court. This process is expensive and the burden on the debtor is very high.

If you are considering filing bankruptcy, it’s unlikely you’ve done anything that will motivate a court to dismiss your case with prejudice, but if you file without a lawyer, there’s a chance that your case will be dismissed for technical mistakes that aren’t worth making. Consulting with an experienced New York bankruptcy lawyer will help you avoid those mistakes.

For answers to more questions about bankruptcy, the automatic stay, effective strategies for dealing with foreclosure, and protecting your assets in bankruptcy please feel free to contact experienced Brooklyn bankruptcy attorney Bruce Weiner for a free initial consultation.

Rosenberg, Musso & Weiner, L.L.P
26 Court St # 2211
Brooklyn, NY 11242, USA

Recent Posts

Beware Grace Periods, Debtors

Too often, debtors see grace periods offered by lenders as free benefits. “Grace” makes it sound so innocent. However, debtors who routinely rely on grace periods when making payments will find themselves facing financial difficulties that might lead to bankruptcy. The reason is that although creditors offer grace periods to debtors, they also use them

Read More »

Bankruptcy May Not Rescue You From Vicious Personal Disputes

Bankruptcy is a technical process that assumes everyone working within it is mostly rational. To the extent that it expects parties to deviate from irrational behavior, the Bankruptcy Code and its accompanying rules include incentives to keep parties in line. Creditors are usually large and impersonal, and they rarely care if their debtors file bankruptcy.

Read More »

Non-Lawyers’ Explanations of Bankruptcy May Be Wrong

Do you have financial problems? Do you tend to ask your friends for advice? Is one of your friends an experienced New York bankruptcy lawyer who will explain the process for you? Are your friends otherwise knowledgeable people? The answer to these questions may be, “Yes but you don’t know it.” Although many bankruptcy lawyers

Read More »

6 Steps to Take Before Filing Bankruptcy

Leaving your case to an experienced New York bankruptcy lawyer is not the only step on the to-do list before filing bankruptcy. There are many things debtors should do (and not do) before they file, and the more organized and mindful debtors are, the easier the process will be and the more effective the result.

Read More »

Social Security Number Not Necessary for Bankruptcy

A question that’s commonly asked about New York bankruptcy is whether a debtor needs a Social Security number to file. Debtors ask because they sometimes run across the bankruptcy form title, “Your Statement About Your Social Security Numbers” (B 121), which asks debtors to list their current and prior Social Security numbers. The new bankruptcy

Read More »

How Can a Debtor (or Creditor) Get a New Trustee?

The trustee in a New York bankruptcy case is usually not the debtor’s ally. His or her purpose is mainly to administer the bankruptcy estate or ensure the debtor’s repayment plan goes according to plan. Trustees pursue preference payments, fraudulent conveyances, and other malfeasance committed by debtors. They frequently initiate adversary proceedings against debtors. In

Read More »
Scroll to Top