Free Consultation
The office is open as per the NYS Covid-19 guidelines. We are now doing both in-person and telephone consultations. Please call the office at 718-855-6840 to schedule a time to speak with one of our experienced bankruptcy attorneys.

Supreme Court Holds That Denied Chapter 13 Plans Cannot Be Appealed

A few months back I noted that the U.S. Supreme Court was going to hear a case on whether the denial of a chapter 13 repayment plan could be appealed. The justices of the Court may not see eye to eye on many issues, but in this case they unanimously held that the answer is no, in an opinion authored by Chief Justice John Roberts.

The case, Bullard v. Blue Hills Bank, began a few years ago when the petitioner, Louis Bullard, filed chapter 13 bankruptcy in Massachusetts. Bullard owed an underwater mortgage on a multifamily home, and he proposed a repayment plan that severed the mortgage into a secured portion that would survive the bankruptcy and an unsecured portion that would be discharged at the conclusion of his case. According to the opinion, he proposed paying about $5,000 out of the $101,000 portion of the unsecured claim. Roberts wrote, “The Bank (no surprise) objected to the plan.” So did the Massachusetts bankruptcy court. Bullard appealed the denial to a First Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP), and then to the First Circuit Court of Appeals, which dismissed his case for lack of jurisdiction, leading to his Supreme Court appeal.

At issue was whether the denial of Bullard’s repayment plan constituted a “final order” in a “proceeding” that could be adjudicated by a higher court. If it were, then Bullard could convince the BAP to require the bankruptcy court to accept his repayment plan. If not, then he would have to propose a different plan. The Court decided that the definition of “proceeding” meant “the entire process of considering plans, which terminates only when a plan is confirmed or—if the debtor fails to offer any confirmable plan—when the case is dismissed.” Bullard was, and is, free to propose another plan.

The Court offered several other reasons to define the “proceeding” as the confirmation process rather than each plan proposal. One is time: Appeals can take months, and the Court did not like the idea of petitioners constantly appealing plan denials. The automatic stay continues through appeals, and the Court was concerned debtors would use that as leverage. Lack of appeal rights encourages debtors to negotiate with the trustee and creditors, and finally debtors have the right to modify plans.

The decision isn’t too surprising, but to be clear its sole purpose is to clarify a procedural matter, and doesn’t make Bullard (or similar debtors) worse off than before. He will just have to come up with a more agreeable plan. It’s possible, though, that Bullard filed in chapter 13 because he didn’t want to sell the underwater house. On the other hand, the lender won’t get fully repaid anyway.

The full text of Bullard can be found here (pdf).

If you have an underwater mortgage, a hybrid plan like the one Bullard proposed won’t be allowed unless the entire secured portion of the mortgage is repaid during the chapter 13 plan. Talking to an experienced New York bankruptcy lawyer can help you come up with alternatives.

For answers to more questions about bankruptcy, the automatic stay, effective strategies for dealing with foreclosure, and protecting your assets in bankruptcy please feel free to contact experienced Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Lawyer Brooklyn NY Bruce Weiner for a free initial consultation.

Rosenberg, Musso & Weiner, L.L.P
26 Court St # 2211
Brooklyn, NY 11242, USA
718-855-6840
http://nybankruptcy.net/

Recent Posts

Beware Grace Periods, Debtors

Too often, debtors see grace periods offered by lenders as free benefits. “Grace” makes it sound so innocent. However, debtors who routinely rely on grace periods when making payments will find themselves facing financial difficulties that might lead to bankruptcy. The reason is that although creditors offer grace periods to debtors, they also use them

Read More »

Bankruptcy May Not Rescue You From Vicious Personal Disputes

Bankruptcy is a technical process that assumes everyone working within it is mostly rational. To the extent that it expects parties to deviate from irrational behavior, the Bankruptcy Code and its accompanying rules include incentives to keep parties in line. Creditors are usually large and impersonal, and they rarely care if their debtors file bankruptcy.

Read More »

Non-Lawyers’ Explanations of Bankruptcy May Be Wrong

Do you have financial problems? Do you tend to ask your friends for advice? Is one of your friends an experienced New York bankruptcy lawyer who will explain the process for you? Are your friends otherwise knowledgeable people? The answer to these questions may be, “Yes but you don’t know it.” Although many bankruptcy lawyers

Read More »

6 Steps to Take Before Filing Bankruptcy

Leaving your case to an experienced New York bankruptcy lawyer is not the only step on the to-do list before filing bankruptcy. There are many things debtors should do (and not do) before they file, and the more organized and mindful debtors are, the easier the process will be and the more effective the result.

Read More »

Social Security Number Not Necessary for Bankruptcy

A question that’s commonly asked about New York bankruptcy is whether a debtor needs a Social Security number to file. Debtors ask because they sometimes run across the bankruptcy form title, “Your Statement About Your Social Security Numbers” (B 121), which asks debtors to list their current and prior Social Security numbers. The new bankruptcy

Read More »

How Can a Debtor (or Creditor) Get a New Trustee?

The trustee in a New York bankruptcy case is usually not the debtor’s ally. His or her purpose is mainly to administer the bankruptcy estate or ensure the debtor’s repayment plan goes according to plan. Trustees pursue preference payments, fraudulent conveyances, and other malfeasance committed by debtors. They frequently initiate adversary proceedings against debtors. In

Read More »
Scroll to Top