Free Consultation
The office is open as per the NYS Covid-19 guidelines. We are now doing both in-person and telephone consultations. Please call the office at 718-855-6840 to schedule a time to speak with one of our experienced bankruptcy attorneys.

More on Bankruptcy Reform’s Legacy: Repeat Filing Continues

I have one more point of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA) of 2005 to analyze: changes to the automatic stay to repeat filings. In the time leading up to its passage, many in Congress (and certainly creditors) believed debtors filed successive, strategic bankruptcies in a manner to avoid paying debts they owed or stay out of foreclosure when they had no realistic hope of staying in their homes.

As a result of the BAPCPA, section 362(c)(3) limits the automatic stay “with respect to the debtor” to thirty days if the debtor had a bankruptcy case dismissed within the previous year. “Parties in interest,” including debtors, can move the bankruptcy court to extend the automatic stay if they can prove their cases were filed in good faith. Lack of good faith includes failing to follow the court’s requirements or failing to demonstrate a “substantial change in the financial or personal affairs” since the prior case’s dismissal.

Despite the seeming innocuousness of this provision, it hasn’t really done much to prevent subsequent bankruptcy filings. For example, one January 2008 study, which surveyed a random sample of north Texas filings between 2004 and 2006, found that debtors merely delayed their second bankruptcy filing to avoid the change to the law rather than reduce the rate of repeat filings. Before the BAPCPA, less than 17 percent of bankruptcy filings were repeats, yet afterward the rate was nearly identical.

After the BAPCPA, by contrast, the timing of the second filing stretched into the future: Instead of 61 percent of second bankruptcies occurring within a year of the first, only 37 percent did, even though the debtors’ circumstances weren’t much different. At the same time, the percent of subsequent filings occurring between one and two years rose from 13 percent to 20 percent. Thus, debtors shifted their tendency to file a successive bankruptcy from within a year to within two, thwarting the purpose of the BAPCPA. Strategic filers will be strategic.

Another study, published in 2015, found that nearly 15 percent of all bankruptcies in 2007 were repeat filings and 69 percent of chapter 13 debtors filed a new petition within a year of their last ones’ failures. Astonishingly, 98 percent of motions to extend the automatic stay under section 362 succeed, indicating that debtors either can afford to wait to file until more than a year and a month have passed, or they get the relief they need anyway. Creditors object to motions to extend the stay a mere 7 percent of the time. The study contains many entertaining comments by bankruptcy judges the researcher interviewed and are worth the read for those who are inclined. The author recommends more in-depth analysis of why people file bankruptcy again and separating frivolous filings from those that have a justification, e.g. losing a job.

The 2008 paper is here; the 2016 one here.

The lesson learned from the BAPCPA is to listen to the bankruptcy judges and lawyers who experience the system firsthand and the academics who research it rather than change the Bankruptcy Code according to political whims.

If you’re encountering financial difficulties in 2016, the BAPCPA is largely irrelevant to you, but many years ago the system worked better for debtors. Nevertheless, you should talk to an experienced New York bankruptcy lawyer to navigate the arbitrary changes the BAPCPA imposed on debtors.

For answers to more questions about bankruptcy, the automatic stay, effective strategies for dealing with foreclosure, and protecting your assets in bankruptcy please feel free to contact experienced Brooklyn bankruptcy attorney Bruce Weiner for a free initial consultation.

Rosenberg, Musso & Weiner, L.L.P
26 Court St # 2211
Brooklyn, NY 11242, USA

Recent Posts

Beware Grace Periods, Debtors

Too often, debtors see grace periods offered by lenders as free benefits. “Grace” makes it sound so innocent. However, debtors who routinely rely on grace periods when making payments will find themselves facing financial difficulties that might lead to bankruptcy. The reason is that although creditors offer grace periods to debtors, they also use them

Read More »

Bankruptcy May Not Rescue You From Vicious Personal Disputes

Bankruptcy is a technical process that assumes everyone working within it is mostly rational. To the extent that it expects parties to deviate from irrational behavior, the Bankruptcy Code and its accompanying rules include incentives to keep parties in line. Creditors are usually large and impersonal, and they rarely care if their debtors file bankruptcy.

Read More »

Non-Lawyers’ Explanations of Bankruptcy May Be Wrong

Do you have financial problems? Do you tend to ask your friends for advice? Is one of your friends an experienced New York bankruptcy lawyer who will explain the process for you? Are your friends otherwise knowledgeable people? The answer to these questions may be, “Yes but you don’t know it.” Although many bankruptcy lawyers

Read More »

6 Steps to Take Before Filing Bankruptcy

Leaving your case to an experienced New York bankruptcy lawyer is not the only step on the to-do list before filing bankruptcy. There are many things debtors should do (and not do) before they file, and the more organized and mindful debtors are, the easier the process will be and the more effective the result.

Read More »

Social Security Number Not Necessary for Bankruptcy

A question that’s commonly asked about New York bankruptcy is whether a debtor needs a Social Security number to file. Debtors ask because they sometimes run across the bankruptcy form title, “Your Statement About Your Social Security Numbers” (B 121), which asks debtors to list their current and prior Social Security numbers. The new bankruptcy

Read More »

How Can a Debtor (or Creditor) Get a New Trustee?

The trustee in a New York bankruptcy case is usually not the debtor’s ally. His or her purpose is mainly to administer the bankruptcy estate or ensure the debtor’s repayment plan goes according to plan. Trustees pursue preference payments, fraudulent conveyances, and other malfeasance committed by debtors. They frequently initiate adversary proceedings against debtors. In

Read More »
Scroll to Top