Free Consultation
The office is open as per the NYS Covid-19 guidelines. We are now doing both in-person and telephone consultations. Please call the office at 718-855-6840 to schedule a time to speak with one of our experienced bankruptcy attorneys.

Is a Payday Loan a ‘Cash Advance’ in Bankruptcy?

Many New York bankruptcy debtors take out payday loans to cover costs before receiving their actual paychecks. I’ve written about these types of loans frequently, particularly the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s attempts to limit them from becoming “debt traps.” Aside from driving debtors into bankruptcy, another place where payday loans can intersect with bankruptcy is when debtors take out cash advances within 70 days of their petitions, which the Bankruptcy Code presumes are fraudulent transfers if they’re greater than $950. Can lenders or the trustee argue that payday loans are cash advances?

The short answer is yes because they can argue whatever they want, but that doesn’t mean it’ll persuade a bankruptcy court.

But the longer answer is that debtors have a good argument on their side: what the Bankruptcy Code actually says about cash advances in section 523(a)(2)(C)(II). Unusually, the Bankruptcy Code doesn’t define “cash advances” in its definitions section and leaves it to this section. Specifically, the statute states that a “cash advance” is “an extension of consumer credit under an open-end credit plan.”

Okay, so what’s an “open-end credit plan”?

A credit plan is open ended if it’s not for a specific amount of money, for example a credit card with a $10,000 limit. A consumer can take a cash advance for amounts under that line. Once the consumer’s credit card amount is repaid, the full amount of credit is available again. A payday loan, by contrast is for a specified amount, i.e. the debtor’s paycheck. Once the payday loan is repaid, it’s done or “closed.”

This should be a compelling argument for debtors facing payday lenders claiming that debts to them are cash advances. However, they can still simply try to argue that the payday loan was still a fraudulent transfer by the debtor with the intent of not repaying the loan.

The problem with this position is that it’s hard for the lender to prove that the debtor didn’t intend to repay the loan, particularly when these types of loans are often used by debtors out of desperation. Obviously a debtor who uses a payday loan to make luxury purchases is going to run afoul of section 523 for different reasons, but that’s going to be unusual.

At the same time, debtors who take out recurring payday loans will be able to argue that their payday loans existed from the first time they took them out, so the 70-day presumption might not be triggered.

Debtors’ alternatives to running the payday lenders’ gauntlet is to either file in chapter 13 or wait until the 70-day period has expired to file in chapter 7.

If you are facing financial challenges, whether you’ve taken out a payday loan or not, then talking to an experienced New York bankruptcy lawyer can help you strategize your best course of action.

For answers to more questions about bankruptcy, the automatic stay, effective strategies for dealing with foreclosure, and protecting your assets in bankruptcy please feel free to contact experienced bankruptcy attorney Brooklyn NY Bruce Weiner for a free initial consultation.

Rosenberg, Musso & Weiner, L.L.P
26 Court St # 2211
Brooklyn, NY 11242, USA
718-855-6840
http://nybankruptcy.net/

Recent Posts

Beware Grace Periods, Debtors

Too often, debtors see grace periods offered by lenders as free benefits. “Grace” makes it sound so innocent. However, debtors who routinely rely on grace periods when making payments will find themselves facing financial difficulties that might lead to bankruptcy. The reason is that although creditors offer grace periods to debtors, they also use them

Read More »

Bankruptcy May Not Rescue You From Vicious Personal Disputes

Bankruptcy is a technical process that assumes everyone working within it is mostly rational. To the extent that it expects parties to deviate from irrational behavior, the Bankruptcy Code and its accompanying rules include incentives to keep parties in line. Creditors are usually large and impersonal, and they rarely care if their debtors file bankruptcy.

Read More »

Non-Lawyers’ Explanations of Bankruptcy May Be Wrong

Do you have financial problems? Do you tend to ask your friends for advice? Is one of your friends an experienced New York bankruptcy lawyer who will explain the process for you? Are your friends otherwise knowledgeable people? The answer to these questions may be, “Yes but you don’t know it.” Although many bankruptcy lawyers

Read More »

6 Steps to Take Before Filing Bankruptcy

Leaving your case to an experienced New York bankruptcy lawyer is not the only step on the to-do list before filing bankruptcy. There are many things debtors should do (and not do) before they file, and the more organized and mindful debtors are, the easier the process will be and the more effective the result.

Read More »

Social Security Number Not Necessary for Bankruptcy

A question that’s commonly asked about New York bankruptcy is whether a debtor needs a Social Security number to file. Debtors ask because they sometimes run across the bankruptcy form title, “Your Statement About Your Social Security Numbers” (B 121), which asks debtors to list their current and prior Social Security numbers. The new bankruptcy

Read More »

How Can a Debtor (or Creditor) Get a New Trustee?

The trustee in a New York bankruptcy case is usually not the debtor’s ally. His or her purpose is mainly to administer the bankruptcy estate or ensure the debtor’s repayment plan goes according to plan. Trustees pursue preference payments, fraudulent conveyances, and other malfeasance committed by debtors. They frequently initiate adversary proceedings against debtors. In

Read More »
Scroll to Top