In the Real World Anonymous Data Is Not So Anonymous

An unfortunate cause of New York bankruptcy cases is identity theft. If a thief gets a hold of a consumer’s personal financial information he or she can easily open false accounts in that consumer’s name and run up substantial charges. Medical identity theft is also a possibility. Consumers can reverse many of these activities, but it takes time, and it might not be possible to do so before other bills become due, leading to bankruptcy. A crucial step to preventing this from happening is for consumers to protect their personal financial information, but as the Equifax breach demonstrated, it increasingly falls to third parties to safeguard people’s information—third parties that may not have much of an incentive to do so, unlike the government. If that wasn’t enough, a recent article in U.K. publication The Guardian recently shows that it’s quite easy to de-anonymize large datasets of personal information. How serious is this, and what can debtors do about it?

According to the article, there are a handful of unvarying markers people use that can essentially identify them without much effort. A pertinent list includes: dates of birth, genders, and ZIP codes. Although statistically it’s quite common for a small group of people to share the same birthdate, the year, gender, and location of any one person makes it all but certain who that individual is, often based on voter registration data or other public databases that combine all these pieces of information.

The potential to successfully identify individuals out of anonymous datasets is quite high. In one study, 87 percent of the U.S. population could be identified with the information listed above. More disturbingly, allegedly anonymous medical records showing patients’ operation dates could also be combined with other public datasets to identify the patients.

The same can be said of geolocation data on mobile phones. Combined with credit-card purchases, researchers can fairly confidently identify people based on their commutes to and from work, their regular spending patterns, and the applications they use.

The article laments that consumers don’t have many options for staying truly anonymous. Using only cash or checks for transactions or abandoning mobile phones are not practical options. They also don’t address the de-anonymizing efforts based on the handful of personal characteristics listed above: birthdate, gender, and ZIP code. Rather, it recommends government and private-sector sources limit researchers’ capacity to duplicate datasets for themselves.

The Guardian article is here.

The truth of the matter is that there’s really no way to perfectly protect your data from anyone. Cautious is warranted, but at least the situations described in the article indicate that the types of information one can glean from a database aren’t the kind that can be used to commit serious identity theft. However, that means information such as Social Security numbers should be given out very rarely because so much else is already available.

If you have suffered identity theft, and it’s affected your ability to repay your debts, then talking to an experienced New York bankruptcy lawyer can help you assess your options.

For answers to more questions about bankruptcy, the automatic stay, effective strategies for dealing with foreclosure, and protecting your assets in bankruptcy please feel free to contact experienced bankruptcy attorney Brooklyn NY Bruce Weiner for a free initial consultation.

Rosenberg, Musso & Weiner, L.L.P
26 Court St # 2211
Brooklyn, NY 11242, USA

Recent Posts

See a New York Bankruptcy Lawyer Before Paying a 25-Year Car Loan

The auto Web site Jalopnik published an investigative report on the predatory behavior of Credit Acceptance Corporation, a subprime auto-loan company with a poor reputation. The story focuses on debtors who signed auto-loan agreements as far back as the 1990s but are still being hounded by the lender decades later and after wage garnishments. The

Read More »

Who Were Chapter 7 New York Bankruptcy Debtors in 2017?

Last year I asked who chapter 7 bankruptcy debtors were, and just a few weeks ago, I discovered that Brooklyn bankruptcy filings were up in 2017 over 2016. Because the federal judiciary’s Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection report (BAPCPA report) came out recently, it’s fair to ask how 2017 compared to 2016 and whether

Read More »

Student-Loan Bankruptcy Alternative Rejects 99 Percent of Debtors

One of the more controversial alternatives to New York bankruptcy for student-loan debtors is Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF). I say “controversial” because many Washington politicians and policy types think it’s much too generous to debtors and should be pared back. PSLF is similar to other government income-derived repayment (IDR) programs, but, well, it is

Read More »

When Exemptions Can’t Protect Everything

For about a decade, New York bankruptcy debtors have been able to choose which set of exemptions to use to protect their assets, federal or state. For most debtors, notably those who aren’t homeowners, the federal exemptions are the best option because they provide a larger cash exemption. The state exemptions, by contrast, are better

Read More »

What Is an Escrow Account and How Can It Affect My Bankruptcy?

“Escrow” is a term that sometimes appears in New York bankruptcy cases. It’s most familiar to homeowners, and its origin is clearly medieval. According to “escrow” is similar to words like “scrap” or “scroll.” It’s only in the last two hundred years, though, that the term evolved to how it’s used today: a deposit

Read More »