Big FDCPA Supreme Court Case Offers Lessons to New Yorkers

Maybe it’s good news for some New Yorkers, but its result probably won’t affect them: The U.S. Supreme Court recently chose to hear a case about whether the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA) applies to parties initiating non-judicial foreclosures. New York State, however, no longer allows non-judicial foreclosures, so the Court’s ruling probably won’t do any good or ill for New York foreclosure or bankruptcy cases. Although, many New Yorkers do own property in other states, so it’s possible that some will have a stake in the outcome. Moreover, the case offers debtors lessons in how to use the law to their advantage against creditors. Here’s what the case, Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP, is about.

Dennis Obduskey bought a home in Colorado in 2007, obtaining a $330,000 mortgage in the process. It’s unspecified in the petition to the Court, but Obduskey must have fallen behind in his payments fairly soon afterward, but the servicer, Wells Fargo, began sending him conflicting loan-modification offers, prompting him to file complaints with the Federal Trade Commission. When he defaulted in 2009, Wells Fargo foreclosed on him only in fits, not completing any of them. Finally, in August 2014, Wells Fargo hired the respondent law firm, McCarthy & Holthus, to foreclose on the property on its behalf, and McCarthy & Holthus sent a notice identifying itself as a “debt collector.” Obduskey invoked the FDCPA to halt the foreclosure until it provided him with documentation validating the debt. The law firm simply re-initiated the foreclosure, leading Obduskey to file a complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Finally, he sued under the FDCPA in August 2015.

How the case wound its way to the Supreme Court is a little more straightforward. The federal district court found that the FDCPA does not apply to non-judicial foreclosures, as did the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. The petitioner appealed.

The conundrum the case raises is what the petitioner refers to as an “extraordinary and entrenched” confusion. Federal and state courts disagree over whether the FDCPA applies to non-judicial foreclosures. To simplify the legal issues, the lower courts in this case agreed that “debt” is a synonym for “money” under the FDCPA. Non-judicial foreclosures don’t obligate consumers to pay money; therefore, the FDCPA isn’t relevant.

The petitioner and other jurisdictions argue to the contrary that mortgage foreclosures are a tool lenders can use to compel borrowers to repay their debts. Debts being money under the FDCPA, foreclosures, then, are subject to the law’s requirements.

Both sides of the disagreement wrestle over some of the semantics of the FDCPA, which I won’t address, and I also won’t speculate as to how the Supreme Court might rule, especially because few New Yorkers considering bankruptcy will be affected by it. Rather, I’d like to highlight one lesson from the case, no matter its result: the petitioner’s tenacity. Every time either Wells Fargo or the respondent law firm attempted to foreclose on his home, he struck back by exercising his legal rights: FTC, FDCPA, and CFPB complaints, as well as this FDCPA lawsuit and its appeals. Clearly he’s not cowed by big banks.

The petition for the case is here (pdf).

If you are facing serious financial difficulties, then you should learn from the petitioner and be willing to exercise your legal rights, including discussing your case with an experienced New York bankruptcy lawyer.

For answers to more questions about bankruptcy, the automatic stay, effective strategies for dealing with foreclosure, and protecting your assets in bankruptcy please feel free to contact experienced Brooklyn bankruptcy attorney Bruce Weiner for a free initial consultation.

Rosenberg, Musso & Weiner, L.L.P
26 Court St # 2211
Brooklyn, NY 11242, USA

Recent Posts

12 Ways to Deal With Parent PLUS Loans

Federal Parent PLUS loans are among the most confusing student loans that New York bankruptcy debtors owe. They aren’t like other government student loans because they’re made to the parent (obviously) of the student rather than the student himself or herself. This can lead to difficulties when parents realize they must pay for debts they

Read More »

If I Get Married Will I Owe My Spouse’s Debts?

Debt can cause serious concerns for romantic couples. One question that can create anxiety in one partner is whether getting married will make him or her liable for his or her partner’s debts. Given that it’s not uncommon for many couples to have unequal debts, assets, and incomes, it’s a topic that comes up frequently.

Read More »

Who Were Chapter 13 New York Bankruptcy Debtors in 2017?

2017 is pretty far in the rearview mirror, but it’s still the most recent year for which the federal courts have provided data via the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act Report (BAPCPA Report). The tables in this report can help New York bankruptcy lawyers and debtors get an idea of just who chapter

Read More »

How Much Interest Do I Pay in a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy?

Brooklyn bankruptcy debtors usually want to discharge their credit-card debts, but sometimes they are “solvent,” i.e. they own more than they owe. For these debtors bankruptcy might not be of much help. Or will it? Sometimes, but not always, a chapter 7 bankruptcy will not be useful to a solvent debtor, but a chapter 13

Read More »

Post-Bankruptcy Options for Underwater Second Mortgages

It’s not possible for debtors to cram down or reduce the principal amount of a primary mortgage in a New York bankruptcy case. This was an unfortunate route that Congress chose to take during the Great Recession. Although, debtors do have options for dealing with junior mortgages that are underwater, i.e. not secured by any

Read More »

Will My Employer Find Out About My Bankruptcy?

Many New York bankruptcy debtors wonder if their employers will find out about their bankruptcies. The short answer to the question is the same for just about anyone whom debtors might fear will learn of their bankruptcy filings: probably not. But as with many New York bankruptcy matters, there are caveats and exceptions. Here are

Read More »