Free Consultation
The office is open as per the NYS Covid-19 guidelines. We are now doing both in-person and telephone consultations. Please call the office at 718-855-6840 to schedule a time to speak with one of our experienced bankruptcy attorneys.

Supreme Court Forbids Surcharge for Debtor’s Fraudulent Exemption

The consequences of the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent unanimous ruling in a bankruptcy case aren’t that monumental for debtors considering New York bankruptcy. However, Law v. Siegel illustrates a few important points about exemptions that are worth knowing.

Here are the facts: Petitioner Stephen Law (don’t let the surname confuse you) filed chapter 7 bankruptcy in California in 2004 (yes, bankruptcy cases can take that long to wind their way to the Supreme Court). He took the $75,000 homestead exemption that state offers, but claimed that he had no other equity in the house due to two mortgage liens, one of which in fact turned out to be fraudulent. After the trustee, Alfred Siegel, spent $500,000 to determine there was equity in the house, he sold it and sought to obtain the $75,000 exemption as a “surcharge” from the bankruptcy court via its equitable powers granted to it by the Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. § 105(a)). Law lost all his appeals up to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court heard the case and held that all the lower courts were in error. Its reason was that a bankruptcy court’s equitable powers are limited by other statutes in the Bankruptcy Code, here § 522(k), which lists the only two situations in which exempt property can be used to pay administrative expenses, like trustee’s fees. They are when the trustee spends money to avoid a transfer of an asset—not costs incurred by investigating bankruptcy fraud. Thus, the exemption shields the $75,000 from the trustee.

Does this open the door to bankruptcy fraud? Of course not. Law’s unlawful acts can be investigated and punished through other mechanisms, examples include: denial of discharge; bankruptcy court-imposed sanctions for bad-faith conduct, which can be full attorney’s fees that are nondischargeable post-petition debts; and of course, criminal prosecution, which can land a debtor in prison for up to five years. If anything, the existing punishments ought to be more than enough for Siegel to recover his fees.

The Court’s opinion can be found here (PDF)

For typical New York bankruptcy debtors, Law v. Siegel is a legalistic ruling and won’t have much impact on anyone’s cases. There are two lessons, though. The first is that exempt property is in fact exempt, no matter the debtor’s fraudulent behavior. The second is that while going alone on a fraudulent bankruptcy petition can get you a day in front of the Supreme Court, it will cost a lot more than hiring an experienced New York bankruptcy attorney in the first place and doing it right the first time.

For answers to more questions about bankruptcy, exemptions, the automatic stay, effective strategies for dealing with foreclosure, and protecting your assets in bankruptcy please feel free to contact experienced fair debt collection practices act Bruce Weiner for a free initial consultation.

Rosenberg, Musso & Weiner, L.L.P
26 Court St # 2211
Brooklyn, NY 11242, USA
718-855-6840
http://nybankruptcy.net/

Recent Posts

Beware Grace Periods, Debtors

Too often, debtors see grace periods offered by lenders as free benefits. “Grace” makes it sound so innocent. However, debtors who routinely rely on grace periods when making payments will find themselves facing financial difficulties that might lead to bankruptcy. The reason is that although creditors offer grace periods to debtors, they also use them

Read More »

Bankruptcy May Not Rescue You From Vicious Personal Disputes

Bankruptcy is a technical process that assumes everyone working within it is mostly rational. To the extent that it expects parties to deviate from irrational behavior, the Bankruptcy Code and its accompanying rules include incentives to keep parties in line. Creditors are usually large and impersonal, and they rarely care if their debtors file bankruptcy.

Read More »

Non-Lawyers’ Explanations of Bankruptcy May Be Wrong

Do you have financial problems? Do you tend to ask your friends for advice? Is one of your friends an experienced New York bankruptcy lawyer who will explain the process for you? Are your friends otherwise knowledgeable people? The answer to these questions may be, “Yes but you don’t know it.” Although many bankruptcy lawyers

Read More »

6 Steps to Take Before Filing Bankruptcy

Leaving your case to an experienced New York bankruptcy lawyer is not the only step on the to-do list before filing bankruptcy. There are many things debtors should do (and not do) before they file, and the more organized and mindful debtors are, the easier the process will be and the more effective the result.

Read More »

Social Security Number Not Necessary for Bankruptcy

A question that’s commonly asked about New York bankruptcy is whether a debtor needs a Social Security number to file. Debtors ask because they sometimes run across the bankruptcy form title, “Your Statement About Your Social Security Numbers” (B 121), which asks debtors to list their current and prior Social Security numbers. The new bankruptcy

Read More »

How Can a Debtor (or Creditor) Get a New Trustee?

The trustee in a New York bankruptcy case is usually not the debtor’s ally. His or her purpose is mainly to administer the bankruptcy estate or ensure the debtor’s repayment plan goes according to plan. Trustees pursue preference payments, fraudulent conveyances, and other malfeasance committed by debtors. They frequently initiate adversary proceedings against debtors. In

Read More »
Scroll to Top